Thanks to Innovation Ohio for calling this to our attention:
"Baffling new video shows Kasich confused about impact of his budget."
Not that this is any big surprise. As Kasich said last month when his allocation of education money was questioning, he's all about "philosophy," not numbers. And that "philosophy" leads to some thinking that looks fuzzy and irrational in the REAL world — you know, the one most of us live in.
Here's what Kasich said:
Interviewer: When you talk about cutting the state income tax, but then if there are cuts that go down to the local level and local communities have to start raising their taxes, isn’t that a problem?
Kasich: I don’t know what you mean by that. What does that mean?
Anyone want to step up and explain to the governor what this means? I'm guessing most grade school children could explain to him what it means?
It means people like me getting maybe $100 back in state income tax cuts and paying $250 more — or maybe $500 more if another levy passes this year — in property taxes. It mean local fee hikes. It means citizens having to pay for services that their municipalities previously provided for free but can't anymore because Kasich snatched away their money.
Personally, I think Kasich knows exactly what it means. But it's part of his "philosophy" — the part that says his wealthy friends get thousands more stuffed in their pockets, while beleaguered local governments charge ordinary people more and more and more just to maintain a decent quality of life.
There's a saying — often attributed by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., although it was around well before his day — that "The arc of the moral universe is long but it bends towards justice."
The whining weenies on the right complaining that Senator Rob Portman is allowing himself to be led off the proper path by supporting his gay son look increasingly like a shrinking band of irrelevant tantrum-throwers. The arc is bending and they're getting left behind. Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council is shrinking in your rearview mirror.
Portman may be the first prominent Republican to voice his support for marriage equality. But many of the others seem to be a bit less, shall we say?, vehement than they have been in the past. As Republicans ponder how to keep their party viable in the face of increasingly unfriendly demographics, they have to face the fact that younger people don't consider marriage equality a big deal.
And here in Ohio there's this:
The far-right Columbus Dispatch polled the issue and ran the results this weekend. It found
Ohioans’ sentiments have shifted dramatically since voters overwhelmingly supported the 2004 ban on same-sex marriage.
It found 54% of Ohioans favoring marriage equality and 40% opposed — less than a decade after 62% voted in favor of the "Defense of Marriage" constitutional amendment in 2004.
While speakers from Equality Ohio and the Human Rights Campaign talked last week at a Cleveland Stonewall Democrats meeting about how your percentage of supporters needed to be at least 57% to have a good chance of passing marriage equality, I'm hearing rumors that these groups are becoming more enthusiastic about revving up the campaign in Ohio. That's good news indeed.
Apparently still pouting that union-busting SB 5 was repealed by an overwhelming margin in November 2011, the Republicans in the legislature successfully rammed HB 47, which limits the time period for collecting signatures for such a referendum, and our governor, Taxin' John Kasich, has signed it into law.
It's just another arm in the Republican drive to limit voter rights and give the public less oversight into what they do.
They're making all kinds of noises about how they really truly want to protect the right of citizens to go to the ballot — they're just making it fairer and "more uniform." Suuuuuure, they are. As with Secretary of Voter Suppress ... I mean STATE Jon Husted's claim that he only wanted to make early voting "more uniform" by limiting it to business hours, you've got to ask, why is it they always want to make things more uniform by limiting rather than expanding access?
It's unclear what happens next. There have been some noises about a referendum to repeal it but I wonder if the energy and enthusiasm would be there. There have also been noises about challenging it as unconstitutional under the Ohio constitution, but it's unclear to me whether anyone is prepared to undertake this or whether they would have solid grounds.
What is crystal clear is that the Republicans in power in Ohio want to make sure citizens have as few avenues as possible for responding to the things they are doing in Columbus.
After a year in which he was unchallenged, a Democrat has stepped up to take on Congressman John Boehner in Ohio's west central 8th district. His name is Andrew Hounshell.
He introduces himself on his Facebook page thusly:
I am an Army Veteran, steelworker, husband, father of triplets and a native son of Ohio. In 2014, I will bring a new face to Washington D.C. that is the heart of Ohio - giving the 8th District the representation it deserves.
Good luck to him. He's going to need it.
I keep reading posts on progressive political blogs from people outside Ohio whining that if only the Democratic Party worked hard enough and poured enough resources into the race, Boehner could be beaten. Many of these people act like it's some sort of travesty that last year, the party focused on potentially more winnable districts.
All the whiners can donate money to Hounshell here:
In 2010, Boehner drew his strongest and most determined Democratic challenger yet in Justin Coussoule who raised more money than any of Boehner's previous opponents and quit his job after the primary to focus on campaigning full time. Yet, in an admittedly terrible year for Democrats, he did worse than some of Boehner's previous opponents who barely campaigned at all.
Now redistricting has made the solidly Republican district even MORE Republican.
Districts like this, where people seem to vote like robots by party ID, are very frustrating. Democrats can recruit good candidates like Coussoule, or like Wayne Powell in Eric Cantor's district in Virginia who have great credentials, a down-to-earth, straight-talking manner, and populist policy proposals that would really benefit most of the people in these districts.
Yesterday former (unfortunately) congresswoman Betty Sutton, who had said earlier this year she was mulling the race for governor, said that she would not be running.
With Congressman Tim Ryan nixing the race earlier this month, that leaves it looking more and more like Cuyahoga County Executive Ed FitzGerald, who has already formed an exploratory committee and booked a bunch of events around the state, will be our candidate.
The only wild card out there now is Rich Cordray, and it remains to be seen whether he will resign his job in the Obama administration and come home to run. He can't wait much longer.
For the last week, Senator rob Portman's change of heart on marriage equality has been a hot issue.
He's now just about the only conservative Republican who has come out in favor of it, after having revealed that his 21-year-old son is gay.
From the left and middle, he's been both congratulated for becoming enlightened and attacked as an opportunist. From the right, he's been condemned, as politicians like John Boehner rush to assure the insane extremists on the far far far right who call the shots in the GOP that they would NEVER do the same thing.
But you know how classy those extremists on the far far far right are — not.
So now they're attacking Portman's SON.
Jackals like Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council (branded a "hate group" by the Southern Poverty Law Center) and Bryan Fischer of the American Family Association are again making hateful comments gay people, with a focus on Will Portman's sexual orientation.
Unfortunately for them, fewer people every day agree with them that being gay is some horrible "choice." And shifting the focus to Will Portman is only going to make them look meaner, more intolerant, and more out of touch.
Good luck with that.
*l to r: Antonio, Holford, Harris, Smithson, Rivera*
Tonight at the offices of the AIDS Taskforce of Cleveland, four panelists presented their take on the hot issue of marriage equality as well as the status of nondiscrimination laws in Ohio that would protect LGBT people from being denied housing or fired from jobs simply for being gay (also known as an equal housing and employment act).
They included State Senator Nickie Antonio, executive director Elyzabeth Holford of Equality Ohio, executive director of the LGBT Center of Cleveland Phyllis Harris, and Michael Smithson of the Human Rights Campaign board of directors and steering committee.
While Antonio gave an overview of the way things are trending in Columbus, Harris brought her ground-level view based on the input she gets from the people the center serves. Holford and Smithson talked about the campaigns to win equality on both levels, describing the patterns efforts in other states had followed.
Both mentioned that all the states that have passed marriage equality had a nondiscrimination law in place first, suggesting that it was a sort of de facto prerequisite for a marriage equality campaign.
That idea was challenged by several in the crowd, including East Cleveland attorney Leslye Huff. She asked why Ohio couldn't follow a different course and wondered if the legislature’s failure to pass a nondiscrimination bill was a way of fending of marriage equality and that perhaps conservative legislators knew LGBT groups would not work on the latter until the former was in place.
It's always disappointing to me that there aren't more Ohio political blogs.
I completely understand why. We've seen excellent bloggers come and go over the years as real life has robbed them of the time needed to collect information and comment with insight on the political doings in our state.
That's why it's nice to see the Franklin County Democratic Party pick up the pace of their postings and solicit some thoughtful content from their members.
Currently, it's leading off with a post by the county party chair Greg Haas asking "Governor Kasich, What Are You Afraid of?" He's addressing Taxin' John's reluctance to open the JobsOhio books and show us exactly HOW he's squandering our taxes. This is a subject that can't get too much attention.
Also this week: commentary on Senator Portman's change of heart on gay marriage. Last week, county commissioner Marilyn Brown contributed a post on the equal pay act called "Chromosomes Shouldn't Determine Compensation." It contains a detailed analysis of what women bring to the workplace and what they DON'T get in return.
If you're looking for something to read that's not as dreary and GOP-ass-kissing as the Columbus Dispatch or the Cleveland Plain Dealer, bookmark this blog.
I dont know why former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld felt it was a good idea to go on Twitter and "celebrate" the tenth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq by congratulating himself and his buddies for it.
Want to see people's response to this?:
I’ll start this by saying that I’ve supported Dennis in the past. I’ve voted for Dennis. I’ve given money to his campaigns. I did positive posts about him and was sorry to see him leave Congress. (see this link: http://ohiodailyblog.com/content/why-dennis-kucinich-will-be-missed)
It’s not that I thought Dennis was the greatest person in the world. It was more that I thought he was an important voice to have in Congress. There are so many far-right voices, I thought it was important to have at least one far-left voice.
But as Dennis Kucinich transitioned out of public office he started to lose me. One of the main head scratchers was his Action PAC and how it operated. As we wrote about here, the timing of the PAC’s endorsements in 2012 was, let’s just say; odd.
Based on conversations I had with a lot of other people we weren’t the only ones confused.
Then there was Dennis’ decision to become a Fox News contributor. Based on YouTube clips I’ve seen of him, he’s awful. He is more than willing to play the weak stupid liberal who they beat up on, and even worse, he works in little bits of praise to the network. Seriously, just watch the video below.
Now I get an e-mail from him where he’s basically trying to fund raise off the anniversary of the invasion of Iraq. The e-mail starts off…
”This is an anniversary not to be celebrated, but observed:”
Really? I’m glad I got that; because I was about to head out to the bars and celebrate my butt off. I mean it’s March, one normally thinks of going out for St. Patrick’s Day, March Madness and of course celebrating the invasion of Iraq.
Thanks, Innovation Ohio, for sharing this hilarious story from the Toledo Blade about dissension among members of the Lucas County Board of Elections. One of its members, Jon Stainbrook, is demanding another, Tony DeGidio, be removed.
Mr. Stainbrook says in the filing with the Ohio secretary of state that Mr. DeGidio is not a valid member of the board because he does not live in Lucas County and because he has an ethics charge pending against him by the Ohio Supreme Court's Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Usually, you expect that Republican members will look for things to attack Democratic members with an vice versa. In this case, it's the two Republicans ripping each other's throats out.
DeGidio has fired back that Stainbrook has a romantic relationship with the board's director Meghan Gallagher (also a Republican) who is under fire and whom the board is attempting to remove, along with her deputy, at the recommendation of secretary of state Jon Husted.
Stainbrook and Gallagher have denied this relationship.
Go read the article. It's a hoot. Even the photos are funny. I don't know either f these guys but Stainbrook looks like a prissy little corporate climber and DeGidio looks like the kind of guy who would disrupt a meeting with his big mouth. I mean, I could be totally wrong but they look like two guys who would not get along.
It's transparent that Plain Dealer columnist Brent Larkin is a shill for the Republican Party. Especially embarrassing were the continual paeans he wrote to former congressman Steve LaTourette. He sounded like he was going to need grief counseling when LaTourette announced his retirement last year.
This weekend, however, he published a column titled "Kasich suddenly faces a lot of Republican resistance." And it's not too laudatory of what's going on in Columbus.
Columbus -- The circus comes to town May 8.
But whatever acts Ringling Bros. brings to Value City Arena for its weeklong engagement here won't hold a candle to what's going on around Capitol Square.
No need to send in the clowns. They're already here.
He's referring to the multiple disagreements going on within the Ohio Republican Party, starting with "Kasich's budget is toast."
Anyone remember when Governor Ted Strickland got his budget through the Republican-controlled legislature by a huge majority? Ah, those were the days!
Of course, Strickland didn't explode spending while cutting money to local governments and public schools, or propose cutting the state income tax (which primarily benefits the wealth) and make it up by expanding the sales tax (which primarily hits the less well off).
And of course, the Tea Party and its minions in the legislature oppose one of the positive things Kasich has done — support the expansion of Medicare. These fools want Ohio to be less healthy and more impoverished.
And then there's a JobsOhio clash, in which Republican auditor Dave Yost wants to see the books and Kasich wants to keep secret how tax money is being spent on this quasi-private bureau, which has never really started to function.
If Kasich and Yost can't cut a deal, the dispute heads to court.
I don't know how many of you have the iron will needed to follow the doings CPAC — the annual conclave of conservatives — this weekend.
It's not just that the purity demanded is off the charts — so off the charts that sitting governors Chris Christie, Bob McDonnell, and John Kasich, conservative extremists every one, were not welcome because each in some way violated that conservative purity (Kasich offended them by advocating for the expansion of Medicaid, one of a handful of reasonable things he's done). In other words, the people who could actually get elected were barred, while among the star speakers were Donald Trump (never elected to anything) and Sarah Palin (never will be again after quitting as governor of Alaska halfway through her only term).
No, it's that The Crazy is also off the charts — and probably a little beyond that. The event has been a cavalcade of lies and hate, and any attempts by anyone on the far far far right, such as Karl Rove, to suggest maybe they should dial it down is met with derision.
Probably the most infamous panel this year was one sponsored by the "Tea Party Patriots" (a real contradiction in terms) called “Trump The Race Card: Are You Sick And Tired Of Being Called A Racist When You Know You’re Not One?”
Since the entire raison d'etre of the Tea Party is hating the President because he's black, you knew this one was waiting to blow up — and it did.
It featured, among other things, a guy dressed as a colonial soldier (forward thinking, these Tea Party types!), complaints that white people are getting short shrift, and to top it all off, a claim that slaves showed insufficient appreciation to their owners for giving them food and shelter.
You think it can't get crazier? It always can with this bunch!
There's quite a debate raging now about how to respond to Senator Rob Portman's shift on marriage equality now that his son has been revealed to be gay. (Portman knew this two years ago, which factors into some of the debates, and many are speculating this is why he wasn't tapped to be Romney's running mate, even though he was very active on behalf of Romney and would have been a safe choice).
I think there's no question that his shift is commendable, and it echoes the general shift on this issue. The feeling that who marries who is nobody's business except the couple's is becoming more widespread.
But many have used this to talk about why it is that so many Republicans cannot think outside the box of their own experience and lack empathy for those whose lives they don't share.
This column by Matthew Yglesias, "Rob Portman and the Politics of Narcissim," was particularly on target:
He brings up the example of Sarah Palin who wanted to cut all federal spending to the bone, but was incensed at the idea of cuts to service for disabled children — because she had such a child.
If Portman can turn around on one issue once he realizes how it touches his family personally, shouldn't he take some time to think about how he might feel about other issues that don't happen to touch him personally? Obviously the answers to complicated public policy questions don't just directly fall out of the emotion of compassion. ... The great challenge for a senator isn't to go to Washington and represent the problems of his own family. It's to try to obtain the intellectual and moral perspective necessary to represent the problems of the people who don't have direct access to the corridors of power
Meanwhile, John Boehner was quick to assure the world that even if one of his kids was gay, he wouldn't change HIS position.
Congressman Tim "The Good" Ryan has announced that he will not be running for governor in 2014. He has long been rumored to be looking at jumping in this race. He follows former governor Ted Strickland in removing himself from contention, winnowing the field early. That's a good thing. The sooner we have a candidate, the sooner we can start going after Kasich tooth and nail.
Ryan will stay in Congress to be the polar opposite of the other Ryan, Paul "Zombie-Eyed Granny Starver" Ryan.
Here's the statement Ryan released:
Statement from Congressman Tim Ryan Regarding the Race for Governor
This is the most exciting time in the history of Northeast Ohio and it has become increasingly clear to me that I will be able to do more for the region, state, and country by continuing to serve in the House of Representatives rather than running for governor. For decades, our young people have yearned for more opportunities, and now those opportunities are growing everyday. By continuing to lead that effort from my current position in Congress, together we can continue to build upon those accomplishments.
We have already accomplished much in our region, from the Austen BioInnovation Institute in Akron, to the Kent Central Gateway project, to the National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Institute and a new billion dollar steel pipe factory in Youngstown. We have made great progress because of regional cooperation including Tech Belt, a vibrant 21st century mega-region that stretches from Cleveland and Akron over to Youngstown and Pittsburgh. Our region's success has been recognized as a model by national and international publications, as well as the President of the United States in his State of the Union.
This is a bit of a bombshell. There are probably teabaggers gnashing their teeth right now and muttering threats to primary him under their breath.
But it demonstrates what a different it can make when people come out to their friends, family and neighbors — if they can. Making family aware that someone they love and want to have a good life is gay can open eyes and minds, if that person is willing to be changed. Obviously, Rob Portman was a big enough person to look at his son and think "Why shouldn't he have the same options as anyone else?"
Unfortunately, it isn't always like this. I recall the case of Alan Keyes' daughter, who took a semester off to work for her radical conservative father when he was the GOP candidate for U.S. Senate in Illinois in 2004. When she came out after the election (after her dad had taken a historical shellacking from someone named Barack Obama), he threw her out and refused to continue paying for her college.
Clearly, Portman is a bigger — and saner — person than Keyes.
I guess pretty much all of us.
It's been nothing but a 100-car off-the-rails catastrophe almost from the beginning. The questionable funding, stolen from the Ohio State Liquor Commission. The questions about the eligibility of Governor Kasich's handpicked crony Mark Kvamme to head it up — and questions about his conflicts of interest and his qualifications to do so. The questions about its very constitutionality. Questions questions questions. Not many answers answers answers.
Not just no answers, it appears, but deliberate attempts to keep from the public what is being done with its own tax money.
Now the governor is trying to keep JobsOhio's financial records a secret even from the Republican state auditor Dave Yost, whose job is to make sure tax money is being deployed appropriately. He's had to subpoena the records. Kasich, of course, is acting like subpoenas don't apply to him. Same old story.
Of course, Kasich has already started his bid for reelection by boasting about all the job creation Ohio has seen, thanks to JobsOhio, which is hilarious considering JobsOhio isn't actually functioning yet.
What's kind of pissing me off though is that — Yost aside — Republican elected officials and the state's rightwing media — aren't making a bigger clamor about this. Republicans are always screaming about spending and "waste." And who else thinks that if this were Ted Strickland doing this there would be outraged headlines day after day on the front page of every daily, not just prissy little editorials suggesting politely that the governor ought to let some sunshine in?
And probably no spin like this from Columbus TV station FOX 28:
COLUMBUS — The showdown with JobsOhio is not over as Democratic lawmakers continue to fire shots at Governor John Kasich and what they say is a lack of accountability in the program.
This really doesn't give me much faith than anything good is going to happen for Ohio's schoolchildren:
The new Ohio Superintendent of Public Instruction will be Richard Ross, who is currently serving as the education adviser to GOP Gov. John Kasich, the Associated Press reported March 12. Ross was selected to the post by the state board of education by a 10-6 vote over other candidates that reportedly included former West Virginia superintendent Jorea Marple.
Now here's a big surprise(not):
[He] received support for taking over the job permanently from several of the state board members, 11 of whom are elected by the public and eight of whom are appointed by the governor (one at-large seat is vacant). Not surprisingly, Kasich appointees weighed in heavily for Ross.
As Kasich's education advisor, he was instrumental in developing the governor's reviled school funding plan, which doesn't even begin to address the inequities that the Supreme Court identified 15 years ago when it struck down the current system of school funding.
If that's not bad enough,
[he] has also been involved in implementing a new A-F school grading system in the state, as well as a proposed expansion of the state's private-school voucher program.
Many are skeptical about the former, and the latter is simply a flagrantly inefficient and wrong-headed use of scarce education funds that harms public education as something that serves all children.
Kasich has used every trick in the book to control the state school board and bend it to his very misguided will. Until he is voted out of office, Ohio's students remain at great risk of having the rug pulled out from under them.
DailyKos blogger Stephen Wolf says,
This diary is about a true, bona-fide progressive stalwart with a knack for running tough campaigns and winning a Republican leaning constituency while being a progressive fighter. This diary is about a liberal hero who remains popular in the nation's most essential swing state of Ohio and won by a larger margin than Barack Obama despite facing an onslaught of $40 million dollars from corporate special interests.
As far as I know, our senior U.S. Senator has no plans to chase the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination. But this blogger at DailyKos thinks he would be an ideal candidate. Naturally some of the commenters disagree. Check it out and see what you think.
I'll bet Josh Mandel already has his eye on the 2016 Republican presidential nomination! Sickening thought.
Wolf concludes his diary,
If Sherrod Brown runs for president I will quit my day job and work day and night to send this great man to the White House. So join me and let's support a true liberal hero for president in 2016.
Sherrod, write that down if you are thinking of running!
Today, once again, there were committee hearings in the U.S. Senate over the confirmation of Ohio's supremely qualified former attorney general Richard Cordray to be head of the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. And once again, the committee vote broke down party lines.
No one is disputing that Rich is the perfect person for this job, and that he has been effective and done good work in the time he's unofficially been head of the CFPB. What Republicans are throwing a tantrum about is that the bureau exists at all and that it is empowered to defend regular citizens against the power plays — the scams, deceptions, and predations — of huge financial institutions and corporations that have all the money, power, information and lawyers on THEIR side. It's a teeny tiny little attempt to balance the scales.
But Republicans don't even want that. They're outraged that people have ANY power against the corporations that they want to become the actual government.
And in an effort to block duly enacted legislation that created the bureau, they are essentially demanding that the legislation be informally repealed by stripping the bureau of any ability to be effective. So they're refusing to confirm anyone to head it.
It's natural for Republicans to be scared of Rich Cordray. He's not on the side of the big special interests who fund them. Since he was elected state treasurer here in Ohio, he's been focused on helping ordinary people, small business people, family farmers, and others not on the radar screen of the people trying to block his nomination.
Such moves are a good thing to keep in mind when you hear some pundit or commentator wringing their hands about the lack of cooperation in Congress, and how what's needed for "both sides" is more bipartisanship and compromise.
But she says things need to change before that'll happen. Yet things aren't changing because the system is set up to favor men — particularly men of a certain type.
In this interview, posted on Salon, Pelosi says,
If you reduce the role of money in politics and increase the level of civility, you’ll have more women elected to public office, and sooner, and that nothing is more wholesome to the governmental and political process than increased participation of women.
Unfortunately this is a problem for more than women. It's a problem in electing decent people of any gender who are truly concerned about the issues facing their constituents and not merely wealthy special interests.
We want the people who come into politics and government to be people who have plenty of options in life. They’re respected in their fields, in their homes, in their communities. Why would they subject themselves to negative campaigns and endless fundraising? They have other options.
She calls herself "the most reviled woman in America, based on political ads against me,"
adding "I can take it; I know why I’m here and I know my purpose, and we always say that if you aren’t effective, they don’t go after you. They leave the people who aren’t effective alone."
All you have to do is look at the ads and attacks already being launched in Kentucky against Ashley Judd, who is said to be thinking of running for the U.S. Senate from that state. But she hasn't announced yet or given any indication that she's about to launch her campaign. You know they are worried because they think she can be successful.
Today Cuyahoga County Commission Ed FitzGerald announced that he's jumping into the 2014 race for governor. That's no surprise to anyone; he's been saying publicly for months he's interested in the job. But he's made it official by forming a co-called "exploratory committee," one of the official steps involved in setting up a campaign.
We hope you will put off whining that he's not well-known enough (of course he isn't at this stage) or that he's not the perfect candidate and you'd prefer someone else until you A. check out his record and positions and B. see who else actually decides to get in the race.
Kasich can be beaten with the right message. Can Ed do it? With our help, I think he can.
It's no secret that so-called "Crisis Pregnancy Centers" exist mainly to stave off abortions by attacking confused and distressed women struggling with unwanted pregnancies with guilt trips, emotional appeals and often blatant misinformation. Often they do a hard sell for adoption as a better alternative.
Now Naral Pro-Choice Ohio has released the results of a year-long study into the activities of Crisis Pregnancy Centers, detailing they ways in which they do and (mostly) don't help women trying to make a decision about their pregnancy.
At a time when a woman's right to determine her own childbearing choices is increasingly under assault, it makes for some interesting reading. You can download the entire report here: http://www.ProChoiceOhio.org/what-is-choice/cpc/reporttext.shtml
A year-long investigation into crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) by NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio Foundation revealed widespread use of medically inaccurate information designed to coerce women from making health care decisions they believe are best for them. The investigation included phone calls with more than 100 CPCs and in-person visits to a randomly selected list of 55.
“What we found was a disturbing pattern of crisis pregnancy center’s willing to mislead women,” said Jaime Miracle, policy director of the Ohio-based organization. “When making a decision about their health women deserve comprehensive, non-judgmental and medically accurate information, so that she can make an informed decision. It’s wrong to mislead anyone seeking medical information.”
They found that such centers lied to women about a link between breast cancer and abortions, and between mental health problems and abortion.
But most disturbingly, they found that one of the centers offered information about or referrals to providers of contraception, other than recommending abstinence or in some cases so-called "natural family planning."
"Disgraced Ex-Congressman Attacks John Boehner in New Book"
"Bob Ney, who was imprisoned for his role in the Jack Abramoff scandal, has some scores to settle."
Bob Ney! There's an illustrious Ohio political name we haven't heard in a while. And now he's written a book, oh joy. But this article is so packed with stories of outrageous behavior and venom directed at other Republicans that it almost makes you want to buy the book even BEFORE it's marked down to a dollar, like Sarah Palin's.
I mean, how could you resist this:
He describes Boehner as “a bit lazy” and “a man who was all about winning and money. He was a chain-smoking, relentless wine drinker who was more interested in the high life--golf, women, cigarettes, fun, and alcohol.” He said Boehner “spent almost all of his time on fundraising, not policy.” He “golfed, drank constantly, and took the easy way legislatively.” Ney recalled Boehner handing out checks on the House floor and said his ties with a tobacco company were so tight that lawmakers could get free cigarettes from Boehner’s office. His golfing, Ney said, was “nonstop” and “paid for by lobbyists.”
Of course, none of that will come as a surprise to anyone who closely follows Ohio politics. Boehner has long been legendary for spending a lot of time golfing with lobbyists in exotic locales not in his district as well as, well, most of that other stuff.
Ney also claims he was stabbed in the back by Boehner, who promised to take care of him if he stepped aside from his seat in Ohio's old 18th district, which was won by Democrat Zack Space in 2008 and alas, by teabagger Bob Gibbs in 2010.
Cleveland's Catholic Bishop Richard Lennon is not exactly the most popular person among Catholics I know. Many have dubbed him things like "Richard the Closer," a reference to the heavy-handed way he managed the closing of dozens of local parishes, ignoring the recommendations of taskforces he convened and refusing to share his reasoning with people. About a dozen of those parishes appealed to the Vatican and won their cases; they reopened last year.
One of those was St. Peter, a vibrant parish whose church is located at E. 17th and Superior. When the church was closed, hundreds of worshippers and their priest Robert Marrone rented a space and continued to worship together as the Community of St. Peter.
Bishop Lennon wasn't happy. Incredibly, he was quoted in the Plain Dealer as saying that if they worshipped in a place not approved by him, "their salvation is at stake."
Apparently, Bishop Lennon thinks he speaks for God.
Now there's this:
"Bishop Richard Lennon excommunicates the Rev. Robert Marrone"
Lennon said in the statement that Marrone violated terms of a leave of absence he had received from the diocese and that he refused to abandon a worship space he and his followers had set up outside the authority of the diocese.
"Father Marrone's recent actions have been in direct defiance of the church's teachings and authority," Lennon said.
The diocese is saying Marrone "excommunicated himself" by his actions, the convoluted way the church likes to pass the buck in these cases.